The Ideal Late 1700 Woman

The warning advanced 1700 Woman Susanna Rowson and Judith Sargent Murray were wowork force from the late 1700s who had their sustain im epoch of the sublime muliebrity. Susanna Rowsons Charlotte A Tale of Truth and Judith Sargent Murrays On the Equality of the Sexes were write to educate, protest, and to guide wowork force in the right path. Murray and Rowson hoped to change the way wo men were be pull ind by men and the way they were viewed by society and themselves, Susanna Rowson and Judith Sargent Murray saw womens roles in the early United States similar.In the 1700s women had a basic education of reading and composing and or so were trained to be jazz m others and augury wives. Womens job was to take maintenance of the children at home, cook, clean, and do housework they were unbroken from the populace. They had no recite in politics, government, or legal issues unless their husband countenanceed them to do so behind the scenes.Susanna Rowsons motive in writing Charlotte was pure, she wrote If the following tale should proceed wiz hapless fair ace from the errors which ruined poor Charlotte, or turn in from imp endpoint misery the heart of one anxious p arnt, I shall feel a much higher gratification in reflecting on this trifling performance, than could possibly closure from the applause which might attend he most elegant finished cull of literature whose tendency might sabotage the heart or mislead the understanding. Rowson wrote Charlotte to settle to change the way boyish women were enlightened.I believe she cute p atomic number 18nts to teach their daughters that they should get a line and pay attention to the advice her p arents give her, provided when also to teach them of the consequences can come if they decide to go in their own path instead of what her parents had planned for her. Susanna Rowson apologized for her story because everyone expected a happy ending but received the opposite. When Charlottes let was on his way for her from England, she passed apart afterward she gave birth to her illegitimate daughter Lucy Temple. umteen questioned, why did Charlotte make to die? Rowson wrote, The drumhead of the youth eagerly catches at promised sport and innocent by reputation, it thinks not of the dangers lurking downstairs those pleasures, till too late to ward off them. I believe the reason Rowson did this was to bear witness to teach young women that there are pros and cons in every decision they make. Rowsons intentions were to guide young women live the ideal life she believed was meant for a women in the late 1700s. Mademoiselle La Rues life was one she ap corroborated of she had eloped from a onvent with a young officer, and, on approach to England, had lived with several distinguish fit men in open defiance of all clean-living and religious duties. Even though La Rue had been with several men she was unanimous and never allowed men to stray away from her path. Mademoise lle had never been seduced by a man. Susanna Rowsons believed in order for a young women to grow up and hold up the ideal life, she should not only mind to her parents but also do as they say. Women in the 1700s were only given a basic education and trained to be housewives.Judith Sargent Murrays On the Equality of the Sexes was written to give women the education they deserved and needed. Murray mat that women were cap qualified of doing more than housework she believed they could do the equivalent as men if not to be better than them. To prove that women and men were equal and should be getting the selfsame(prenominal) education she questions, May not the quick military groups be ranged under these four heads- whim, reason, memory, and view? As the Enlighten women she gave evidence to everything she state or wrote. She proved that men and women had the same capability to imagine.She wrote but as proofs of a creative faculty, of a lively imagination, Murrays evidence that women had an imagination was gossiping. If women didnt lead an imagination how would they be able to come up with such enkindle rumors and gossip? Murray goes on to say, Are we lacking(predicate) in reason? We can only reason from what we know, and if an opportunity of acquiring companionship hath been denied us, the inferiority of our switch on cannot fairly be deduced from hencece. She is saying if they teach women physics, psychology, and other subjects withal the rudiments they can prove they have the same power of reasoning as men.She then proves that women also have the power of memory, because women memorize stories and share them with others. Murray wrote, Female would convey discreet, their notion would be invigorated, and their partners for life macrocosm circumspectly chosen, an unhappy Hymen would then be as rare as is now the reverse. She believed if women had the same education as men, women would be not only cause to be perceived but also better wives. Murray believed that everyone was innate(p) equal but society taught them that they were different.To prove that equality is given by temper she questions, Will it be said that the judgment of a male of two class old is more sage than that of a females of the same age? She compared two year olds to prove that they are equal until they get to school. Once in school society doesnt allow women to have the same opportunity to learn. They are automatically put in different schools where they are taught different material. She goes on to say How is the one exalted and the other down(p) by the contrary modes of education which are adopted The one is taught to aspire and the other is early confined and moderate. Women are limited and that is why they do not have the same knowledge as men do. She believed women should not only get educated on not being seduced by men but also felt up that they should have the same education as men. Murray believed women should have the same opportuni ty as men in society. Women should be able to independently provide for themselves, but collectible to lack of education they were not allowed to do so. Murray brings religion into her endeavor when she writes, our souls by nature equal to yours the same glimmering of idol animates, enlivens, and invigorates us.She proves that men are no different from women when they came into this world. God took the same breath into both men and women so what makes men better? Susanna Rowson and Judith Sargent Murray both intended to reach, standardized Rowson wrote, the young and thoughtless of the fair sex. When she wrote Charlotte A Tale of Truth, she wanted to encourage vulnerable young women from doing the wrong thing. She wrote, Oh my lamb girlfriendsfor to such only am I writinglisten not to the juncture of love, unless sanctioned by paternal cheers be assured, it is now past the age of romance. Rowson felt that women should know some of the basics to protect themself from rakes , and wanted to teach them to embrace the right man. She felt as if young women were easily seduced by men. She warns the reader by writing In affairs of love, a young heart is never in more danger than when at bided by a handsome young soldier. For example, Charlotte opinionated to rebel against her parents and became romantically involved with Montraville, a man her parents disapproved of. Charlotte was a young simple-minded 15 year old girl that got seduced by an attractive man that promised the world to her.He promised to marry her but instead, took her to new(a) York, and then he aban maked her and their unborn child. Charlottes fate went bad when she intractable to follow her heart instead of her parents. She was seduced and betrayed by the man she fell deeply in love with, this is what Rowson was trying to prevent in the lives of her young readers. In Part II of Judith Sargent Murrays essay she wrote, Praise is sugary to the soul we are immediately lift up by large dr aughts of flattery, which being plentifully administered, is to the pride of our hearts the most acceptable incenses. In Murrays essay she writes that women were seduced by men with their intellectuals. She felt that women should be educated on how not to be tempted when a man tried to seduce her. Rowson and Murray both believed that women should be educated on how to avoid falling into lure and how to moreover their reputation. In the late 1700s women were seen as the temptress and punished for seducing men. But why is it okay that men are allowed to tempt women and get away with it? In Charlotte, Rowson tries to inform everyone that men are the temptress, not women.Charlotte go for Montravilles lies and betrayal because she had sympathy for him. Rowson stop her story to put her input about women being too compassionate, when once she has muzzy sight of the basis on which reputation, honor, everything that should be dear to the female heart, rest, she grows hardened in guilt, will spare no stock to bring ceeds from that diabolical spirit of look up to. Men know that once women initiation feeling sympathy for someone they send packing the wall that they was there to protect them from go the fallen charwoman, Rowson and Murray wanted this to change.Judith Sargent Murray and Susanna Rowson were smart women that wanted young women to be educated. They differed on their opinions on how much education a woman should have. Murray believed that women should have the same education as men, and Rowson believed there was a limit on the amount of education a woman should receive. Both believed that young women should be educated to the extent where they did not fall into temptation and be marked as a temptress. In their stories they gave proof of what they believed should be done and why.